The SOAR Security Landscape in 2025 Security Orchestration, Automation, and […]
SOAR Security Tools Compared: Why Reclaim Is the Evolution Beyond SOAR
The SOAR Security Landscape in 2025
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms promised to streamline security operations. Yet as the market matured, many teams found themselves juggling complex playbooks, limited integrations, and endless tuning. Today, with security teams overwhelmed and tech stacks bloated, a better path is emerging. One focused not on more automation scripts, but on autonomous remediation aligned to real-world business needs.
The average organization uses 43 security tools. According to Gartner, 75% of security leaders are actively pursuing vendor consolidation. In that environment, SOAR solutions must prove not only their power—but their simplicity, interoperability, and return on effort.
How the Top SOAR Tools Compare
| Vendor | Playbook Flexibility | Integration Depth | AI/ML Support | Ease of Use | Licensing Model | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR | High | Strong (native to Cortex) | Basic | Moderate | Per Node | Large Enterprises |
| Splunk SOAR (Phantom) | Advanced scripting | Broad | Limited | High learning curve | Per License | Security Engineers |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Moderate | Strong with IBM Stack | Medium | Enterprise-friendly | Enterprise License | IBM Ecosystem Users |
| Swimlane | Very High | Custom Integrations | Optional | Complex | Custom Quote | Large MSSPs |
For many teams, traditional SOAR tools bring a mix of power and pain. While they enable orchestration at scale, they often require months of engineering effort to fine-tune and maintain, just to automate the basics.
Why SOAR Alone Is No Longer Enough
The security landscape has evolved. Modern threats move too fast for playbook-based automation to keep up. Security teams can’t afford to spend weeks tuning workflows just to respond to known issues. What’s needed now is preemptive, policy-driven action without waiting for a playbook to trigger.
Read our 3 part blog series about Preemptive Security
Limitations of Traditional SOAR
- High Engineering Overhead: Building and maintaining playbooks requires advanced skill sets.
- Delayed Remediation: Most SOARs wait until alerts trigger too late for many exposures.
- Tool Fatigue: Many SOAR users rely on patchwork integrations that often break.
- Business Context Blindness: Traditional SOARs lack the insight to validate if a remediation will break key business functions.
How Reclaim Goes Beyond SOAR
Reclaim doesn’t just close tickets, it delivers measurable business outcomes across your environment. By continuously assessing security posture, maximizing ROI on tools like CrowdStrike and M365, and eliminating manual overhead, Reclaim enables your team to act faster, prove value, and stay ahead of threats. Whether you’re trying to reduce MTTR by 70%, cut exposure from misconfigured tools, or drive up ransomware resiliency using the stack you already own, Reclaim transforms your security operations from reactive maintenance to proactive control.
Reclaim Security is not a SOAR platform. It’s a platform for autonomous security controls. Automated exposure remediation that happens before the alert, with zero scripting and full operational awareness.
Key Advantages
- No Playbooks Needed: Reclaim uses intelligent policy engines to fix issues automatically—no human stitching required.
- Business Impact Awareness: Its Productivity Impact Prediction Engine (PIPE™) models how security changes affect users and operations before rollout.
- Massive Time Savings: Customers report 90% reduction in MTTR and 3x more issues resolved with the same headcount.
- Tool Optimization: Reclaim enhances tools like Microsoft Defender, M365 E5, CrowdStrike, and Okta—maximizing value from your current stack.
Instead of reacting, Reclaim preempts. Instead of orchestrating alerts, it fixes exposures. It’s not a SOAR it’s the evolution of remediation.
Read the complete Guide to Security Automation
When to Rethink Your SOAR Strategy
If your SOAR deployment feels heavy, slow, or underused—it might be time to think differently. Ask yourself:
- How often are your playbooks executed?
- How long does it take to go from exposure discovery to fix?
- What percentage of fixes are still manual?
- Are your tools acting in unison—or just alerting in parallel?
Consolidation doesn’t mean doing less—it means making what you already have work smarter. And that starts with automation that closes the loop, not just opens more tickets.
Ready to See the Future of Remediation?
Reclaim helps security teams fix what others only flag. No playbooks. No backlog. Just results.
Or explore how we helped Aqua Security transform remediation with Reclaim.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is SOAR in cybersecurity?
SOAR stands for Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response. It refers to platforms that integrate alerts, automate workflows, and enable incident response in cybersecurity operations.
Is Reclaim Security a SOAR platform?
No. Reclaim is not a SOAR. It is an autonomous exposure remediation platform designed to fix security gaps before alerts are triggered, without requiring playbooks or scripting.
How does Reclaim differ from traditional SOAR tools?
Reclaim focuses on automated remediation, not orchestration. It models business impact before making changes, eliminating the need for human-authored playbooks.
Does Reclaim integrate with existing security tools?
Yes. Reclaim optimizes tools like CrowdStrike, Defender, Microsoft E5, and others to improve their remediation capabilities and operational efficiency.